People’s Party leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut has reaffirmed his commitment to amending Section 112 of the Criminal Code, acknowledging that the move carries significant political risks.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday at the party’s headquarters, Natthapong stressed that the law still contains flaws. He added that any amendments must comply with the Constitutional Court’s ruling.
The party leader admitted he cannot control “legal warfare,” a factor he said could trigger political accidents. When asked whether pushing for change might invite political mishaps, he conceded that such risks were beyond his control.
Nattapong also addressed a recent interview he gave to TIME magazine, where he reiterated his party’s stance on Section 112.
He noted that part of the government’s framework was conditional on opening the door to constitutional reform within four months.
Such reform, he said, is essential to bring the roles of independent organisations in line with international standards and to end the cycle of legal warfare.
Looking ahead, Nattapong outlined the People’s Party’s plans for the upcoming debate on Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s policy statement.
He said the party would focus on cabinet members with questionable qualifications or potential conflicts of interest. Policies deemed unsuitable would also be subject to scrutiny.
The party leader further highlighted that the People’s Party, together with Bhumjaithai and Pheu Thai, has agreed to pursue amendments to Chapter 15 of the Constitution within the four-month timeframe outlined in their Memorandum of Agreement (MoA).
He emphasised that the People’s Party’s more than 140 votes would be used to ensure the government adheres to the MoA.
“I still believe the direction is good,” Nattapong said. “But the moment we see any sign of breaking promises or delaying, we are ready to use our votes to scrutinise the government.”
Responding to recent comments by MP Rakchanok Srinork on ministerial quotas, Nattapong clarified that her views were personal. He reaffirmed that the People’s Party had no involvement in forming the government and has consistently maintained its role as the opposition.
